RFP for Photo Enforcement Systems and Related Services
Project #: | 3986-23 |
---|---|
Issued by: | City of Beaverton, OR |
Publish Date: | Mar 10, 2023 4:00PM |
Bids Due Date: |
Apr 7, 2023 2:00PM
(Pacific Standard Time)
|
Status: | No award issued |
Award Notes: | Proposals under Evaluation |
Description
The City of Beaverton is seeking sealed proposals from qualified consultants to provide photo enforcement systems and related services. Consultants are invited to submit a proposal outlining their experience and qualifications in performing work directly related to the services required.
Attachments
This project has the following solicitation documents.
Vendor Questions and Answers
Submitted Questions About This Bid
These are vendor questions for which the agency has supplied an answer.
Questions | |
---|---|
Reference: Section 3.12 Public Records - "If the trade secret or confidential information is only on a portion of a page, Proposers must so identify the trade secret or confidential information at the top of each page in bold and list the section title that is to be marked a trade secret or confidential information." Question: Is it acceptable to use a highlight color to identify Trade Secret or Confidential Information? |
Asked Mar 28, 2023 12:48PM
|
Answer:
The page should still be identified at the top as containing confidential information, but a highlight of the specific information in the page in addition to this is acceptable. |
|
Reference: Section 5.2 Selection Process - "1. Review for inclusion of all elements specified in Proposal Content and Format in Section 4.1. Any proposals that do not include all required elements may be rejected. " Question: Please confirm that requirements 4.1.5 Page Limit, 4.1.6 Commitment to Sustainability, 4.1.7 Proposal Submittal Addresses, and 4.1.8 Submission Deadline are not required in the proposal response. |
Asked Mar 28, 2023 12:49PM
|
Answer:
This is correct; they are not elements that are required to be addressed in the proposal, just elements that will affect the validity of the proposal. |
|
Reference: 5.1 Evaluation Criteria - "Evaluation Factor: 2. Project Approach & Understanding Approach and processes for each subcategory in Section 2. " Question: Please confirm SOW sections 2.9 Pre-Qualification of Proposers, 2.10 Pre-Proposal Conference, and 2.11 Single Point of Contact are not required in the response. |
Asked Mar 28, 2023 12:50PM
|
Answer:
This is correct; these are not elements that are required to be addressed in the proposal. |
For Questions or Additional Information, Contact:
Name: Michael Phillips
Email: bidmail@BeavertonOregon.gov
Share:
Your submitted questions |
---|